A Dangerous Method (2011)

Published: Apr 25, 2012

Synopsis

Formation of psychoanalysis and meeting of minds between Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung.

Genre
Historic drama
Production year
2011
Director
David Cronenberg
Male actors
Viggo Mortensen
Michael Fassbender

General spoiler alert!

» To my understanding...

Dangerous Method

Freud is a King archetype, dominant, in control, the expert who expects people to ask him for advice. He finds it difficult to be wrong, almost impossible. The film describes him as the father in some scenes, clearly analytical and nurturing.

Jung is the Warrior, his clothes, mannerisms and words are purposeful and not wasteful. He's direct, straightforward, moralistic, and wants to take psychology to new areas using his adventurous side and critical judgement.

Freud, Jung interact well at first, sharing an interest and having different insight. The relationship breaks down as they can't relate to one another maturely. Freud wants to be right and dominate, Jung is a threat to his identity, to the throne.

For Jung, Freud is unreasonable, closed minded and cannot see the opportunities and benefits that his ideas may hold. He has a desire to help those in his care rather than attach labels to patients as Freud does.

Emma, Jung's wife is clearly the Queen, reserved, dignified with an air of importance that would be there without her wealth. Her marriage is broken as they can't relate but she is dutiful, proud and will find a way to make it work. She doesn't see the problem clearly and tries to fix things in other areas, like having children, when that doesn't work, it must be he wanted a boy.

Otto, is the Lover, experiencing life deeply, holding no morals or boundaries that would limit the experience. Up for anything, he has addiction problems and is too deep in thoughts. When he meets Jung, for the first time Jung smiles and appears to be happy. Their archetypes complete each other and they relate well despite professional responsibilities. Otto can be aggressive that make him appear to be more of a warrior, but it's a rolling with the feelings, violence is fine with him if he feels it to be appropriate.

Now the mistress Sabina, a Warrior like Jung, whose personality doesn't fit in with the current society and is considered insane and then convinced of it.
She is strong, direct, ready to battle, doesn't mince her words and handy with a knife in one scene.

Being two warriors, it was never going to last. After realizing who she is and that it's ok, she became dependent on him for her excitement. She helped Jung become more of a warrior, giving him the opportunity to dominate her, to discipline her and showing him what he's been missing with his own family.

He like Sabina before, doesn't fit in this society and when he pushes her away for guilt reasons he disconnects from his family and the world, he falls in to the warrior shadow. On their last interaction together, Jung breaks down and slips in to a lover personality, a manipulation to fit her warrior. The dishonesty is clear to see and is cringe worthy to her, he has lost his identity, his strength. The caring, feeling, lover nature is fine when you're that personalty, if you're not, then it's weak and needy and it gave Sabina momentum to leave.

It's a sad end to the film seeing the Jung family putting up pretenses, "everything is fine here move along". Jung, isolated by his own doing. None of the cast had the maturity to say "hey, this isn't working, let's not be miserable, we gotta separate."

Never forget, when you're with the right person, you know it in your gut. It's an unmistakable feeling. Be happy, make good decisions.

»Return to user reviews

Please take a moment to give feedback below. Thanks!

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Text length
Inspiration level
Challenge meter
Overall

9.0

(1 votes cast)

Text length: Lower score means too short, higher score means too long. Inspiration level: How inspired are you from reading this? Challenge meter: Do you feel challenged to make some shifts as a result of reading this? Overall: How good was your overall experience going deeper with this movie? Only this score goes towards the average.

Did you like this user review?

Then why don't you write one of your own?

Discuss A Dangerous Method below:

  • EivindFS

    Hey Jp,

    I like your review – and your taste in movies – but may I suggest to you that the way you write about archetypes could use some fleshing out.

    You write about the people in the movie as if they WERE an archetype. The deeper understanding is that a person and an archetype are completely separate entities. A person merely channels archetypal forces, whether consciously or not.

    So it is inaccurate to suggest, as you do towards the end of your review, that a person can enter the Lover and do so inauthentically because he doesn’t have the Lover in him. We all have the Lover in us. We also have King, Warrior and Magician in us. The question is – are our egos capable of channeling them in a mature way?

    That said, when I see Jung, I resonate more with the Magician in him. That’s what stands out for me. But as with all men, he has the Warrior in him too.

    Great effort, dude. I hope to see more from you.

    Cheers,
    Eivind

Tired of being a nice, domesticated man? Time to take a chance in life and offer your gifts to a burning world?

If so, would you like to join a tribe of hundreds of men all over the world who are committed to inner and outer growth? Would you like to stay up to date on the latest developments on this site?

And would you like to receive a unique introduction to the archetypal system King, Warrior, Magician, Lover, for which this website is famous?

Then sign up now and join us as we co-create a better world.

I look forward to getting to know you!

Warmly,
Eivind, Masculinity-Movies.com founder

Read previous post:
600full-garden-state-poster
Garden State

Reawakening emotional capacity The greatest theme explored in this movie, to me, is the journey towards reawakening what Michael Brown...

Close