Hollywood as a lens to the American shadow

The US is a country that has not experienced foreign powers on home turf after its formation*. One would think this would lead the American mind to a place of harmony and peace. Yet, Hollywood moviemaking features an unmatched number of movies with invasions, presidential kidnappings, burning government buildings etc.

Why is it that Hollywood has such tremendous fascination with spectacular attacks on the USA, when, disregarding a few isolated examples, relatively few in number, they bear so little connection to reality? What can we deduce about the American psyche by really examining this odd phenomenon?

Come with me now on a journey of exploring this paradox.

Introduction

4th of July, 1776 was the day the Declaration of Independence changed the history of the world. It was a time of war and of a revolution in consciousness. For at this crossroads, the founding fathers authored a document that would not only lay the foundation for a new and great nation, but bring into being a consciousness the world had not yet known: The understanding that all men are created equal.

Ever since the signing of this revolutionary document, the United States has enjoyed a history remarkably free of real (not imagined) threat at home.

Olympus-Has-Fallen-Quad-Poster-UK_thWhat I realized in a plane somewhere above Greenland recently was that Hollywood seems not to have noticed. Headed towards Washington DC, I watched two movies that featured presidents being kidnapped and evil powers invading or threatening from afar. The movies were GI Joe Retaliation and Olympus Has Fallen.

Whenever I'm on a transatlantic flight, I find myself in a liminoid space - as if I'm in a death process of sorts. And from that space of heightened awareness of the unconscious realm, this made no sense to me at all. It struck me as deeply paradoxical.

Shortly after my trip, White House Down was announced, its imagery and theme almost mirroring Olympus Has Fallen, further strengthening my desire to investigate.

The US: Origin story

MayflowerThe history of the US started in 1620 with a ship called the Mayflower. The vessel, en-route to New England, carried about a hundred people. They were largely Puritans who sought a life free from religious prosecution, but also craftsmen of all kinds. The white man had arrived on American shores. This time for good.

What level of influence on contemporary American life does this ship and its passengers have? What does it mean that the first American settlers were pious people fleeing religious prosecution? It is hard to say. But I see today pious paranoia featured prominently in places such as Fox News. I don't think it's a coincidence. The passengers of the Mayflower set a precedence.

Then, in 1775, come the English. Greedy for power and control, they are not about to let this new and bountiful continent depart from the Commonwealth without a fight. But the French, Dutch and Spaniards intervene on the side of the 13 freedom-seeking American territories, and together, the coalition win the war. The United States is born. A new chapter in the history of the world starts.

And yet, however traumatic these events must have been to the fledgling US psyche, I don't belive they fully explain the paranoia Hollywood displays in its moviemaking. Most European countries have been through hardships greater and more terrible than those of the US and yet their movie output seem to feature much fewer examples of these themes.

Searching for clues along the Washington Mall

When I arrived at the Mall in DC, I was drawn particularly to the newest addition to the Smithsonian: The Museum of the American Indian. This is a beautiful building and a wonderful exhibition – worth a visit. Walking through its curved halls, studying the traumatic history of the American Indian, the flash of insight I'd had on the plane started crystallizing. What does it amount to in but a few words?

museum-of-the-american-indianThe United States was stolen.

When the white man arrived in North America, he carried germs against which the American indian immune system had no defense. The germs effectively carried out a genocide, wiping out 90% of the Native Americans. NINETY percent. Just pause at the magnitude of that for a few seconds.

The white man had little trouble dealing with the remaining Native american resistance. In an effort to create a good life for themselves and their families, citizens of this new nation took the land from the Native American. And in just a few years, they managed to virtually wipe out the American Buffalo, the animal so sacred to the Native American, showing in the process, true to the Western industrial mindset, their horrific contempt of the miracle and mystery of nature and its inherent sacred order.

American_bison_k5680-1What happened was the start of great things. The way that it happened was very wrong.

In observing this, something shifts in me and I’m pulled into a very deep place, one of unmourned dead, uncried tears, unshaken shakes, unshouted screams and unspoken guilt. A place which this museum puts us in more intimate connection with.

The deep place I’m tuning into is the same place of shadow and grief that has completely consumed Nathan Algren as The Last Samurai, one of the movies reviewed on this site, opens. He is traumatized, so guilty and ashamed for the terrible things he has done to the Native Americans. His superior Colonel Bagley, however, is not feeling any of that; he enjoys the emotional disconnection expected of any good soldier. Nathan, however, is not a soldier; he is a Warrior. And the actions he has carried out on behalf of the invading white man are hostile to his soul.

America’s curse

I have come to develop a deep fascination for and respect of the teachings of depth psychology (the branch of psychology which includes the unconscious).

In the process of deepening my understanding of the pervasive influence our unconscious minds exert on us, both individually and collectively, I have come to realize the importance of grieving that which was wrong and of discharing traumas. Whenever traumas are repressed, they fester. Eventually, they take us over.

Robert-Bly-1986The stealing of the United States from the American indian and the subsequent pillage and rape of the land which the American Indian considered sacred is a trauma that, as far as I can tell, has not yet been discharged. It has become shadow – the leper child stowed in the basement.

American poet and founder of the Men’s movement Robert Bly has spoken much of this, of the repression of emotion that is required to live in this world as if it’s a place of sanity. He laments the lack of grieving in American culture. He laments the lack of grieving for the plight of the Native American. He laments the lack of grieving for the plight of the US war veterans, worshipped and idealized while still fit to represent heroic ideals, yet discarded the minute their bodies and minds take on the scars of war.

In observing all these Hollywood movies with stories of threats from afar and dark conspiracies from within, it may prove interesting to reflect on the following: The threat from afar was once the white man.

In the absence of fully feeling, grieving and discharging the impact of the plight of the Native American on the collective US psyche, protection mechanisms have been put in place.

One of these mechanisms is a powerful army. Its use in combat against a perceived threat conveniently distracts from the unhealed trauma at home.

Staying in conflict thus becomes an imperative.

A Warrior culture in need of a King

Whitehouse-Down-Trailer-2-010What do these movies with burning White Houses, exploding Capitol Buildings, kidnapped presidents and evil lurking in the shadows tell me? It tells me of a constant fear in the collective US psyche that the leadership of the nation, and thus the harmonizing force of the King archetype, will disappear, be corrupted or otherwise destroyed. The axis mundi is under threat, much like it once was for the Native American civilization.

In observing that, I note that Hollywood voices a deeper truth – many Americans, like so many other people in the world, don’t feel safe. And in looking for the source of this pervasive sense of unsafety, many people, particularly the more conservative and ethnocentric, cannot bear to seek inside – for there waits the pain of the Native American trauma and a whole host of other repressed emotions. And so, they look outside for the nemesis, while heading for the nearest gun store flying the banner of individual freedom. Blinded by the hercules complex, they may call it courage. Though they would be wrong. It is the opposite.

If I wish to avoid confronting myself, I’d better confront another. Thus, I can feel safe in my identity as long as I have an enemy. Seeing that tendency in the American psyche puts the American obsession with being custodians of world peace, guardians of humanity, in new and troubling light.

The American world policing seems to come from a misplaced attempt at healing trauma as opposed to a place of empowerment. It seems a striving for redemption, partly fuelled, I believe, by an identity formed through heroic efforts in World War II, the last honorable war the United States engaged in, and partly through ethnocentric, religious zealotry.

As I alluded to above, a Warrior can feel on purpose as long as he stays engaged in conflict. There is something to fight for, something to rally around. Pausing to contemplate whether the fighting serves the transpersonal purpose essential to the mature Warrior is easily forgotten – any kind of fighting will have a Warrior feel alive.

But if there is no harmonizing King energy to facilitate the fighting, the acts of fighting become pointless, inevitably ending up destroying the world as opposed to defending it, much like the Buddhist myth of the crane and the crab (the crane is a symbol of the Warrior).

Hollywood’s constant display of the fragility of the American axis mundi should be of great concern. Without that axis mundi, a Warrior, like the crane in the myth, ends up eating the fish it swore to protect. And if we are to believe the myth, the crane gets its head clipped off.

Signs of our times, the building financial bubble being one of them, suggest that the head of the US is about to get clipped off. And with the pervasive influence ethnocentric, religious zealots have in the US now, that is something large parts of the world is rightly afraid of.

In the process of bringing the American leper child up from the basement into the light, we are running short on time. Hollywood movies like the Last Samurai and Dances with Wolves as well as the museum for the American Indian on the Washington Mall have made honorable contributions to this process.

But it's not enough. In the act of constellating a strong axis mundi for the US and the rest of the world, we must all get busy, stepping into healthy leadership wherever we can.

The US story is the human story

If you have an anti-American bent, you may have felt a certain sense of glee reading this article. Watch out for that one. For this is not an American story, it truly is the human story. All across the world are countries where militarism, ego and paranoia are used to distract from the real issue. We have a world scene lacking in healthy King energy and it is our collective responsibility to address this situation.

I got a small taste of what that might mean for me when, on my trip, I had the privilege to share my views with an American woman trained as a Native American Grandmother. She nodded as I shared my views on Hollywood movies and their relationship to the Native American trauma and replied “I’m so glad you see that. Maybe you should tell someone about that.”

So I did.

*there was an incident with the burning of key government buildings in Washington DC by the English in 1814

Discuss the article below:

  • Tom J. Cassidy

    This is neither new nor uniquely American. “Invasion fiction” first caught the popular imagination of the British public when “The Battle of Dorking” (1871) imagined a newly-united German invasion of mid-Victorian Britain. Since then, the genre has been recycled and retailored to fit the time of its republications, usually most popular in Anglo-Saxon countries.

  • Interesting, Tom. I haven’t heard the term “invasion fiction” before. Will look it up.

    Yes, I have noticed that of all the countries in Europe, the UK seems most into war movies of that type. Not that I have the full overview, but that’s how it appeared to me.

    Why do you think this “invasion fiction” is particularly prevalent in Anglo-Saxon countries? Maybe there are more variables in here that I don’t know about. Or to rephrase – there certainly is!

  • Tom J. Cassidy

    Elvind,

    My own conjecture is that, given how Anglo-Saxons have conquered far more than been conquered – 1066 was the last time for most; 1865 for Americans of a certain attitude – invasion fiction fills a literary and psycho-cultural gap which in other cultures is historical fact.

  • So since Anglo-Saxons haven’t experienced many invasions over the last millennia, they have a desire to experience what it might be like by creating fictional stories about it? Never thought about that. I’m going to have to sit with that for a while – I’m not seeing the truth of that yet.

    It’s an interesting idea though, so if this were true, where else do you see this psychological dynamic played out?

  • Tom J. Cassidy

    It seems to me like an unrealized or sublimated wish for a thrill without the consequences, a bit like watching a horror movie or riding a roller coaster or bungee-jumping – a wish exploited by salesmen who know how to “give the people what they want.” At least, it seems so to this amateur historian/sociologist/psychologist.

    About the only other place I see “invasion fiction” finding a market would be Japan. In contrast, their invasion fiction seems rooted in actual historical experience. True, they were invaded and occupied but that was once in a long history, and fairly benign as invasions and occupations go. In this case, although they’ve produced some “space alien” movies, Japanese cinema has sublimated their invasion experience in the Godzilla movies. This “threat from the sea” could easily stand for something historical – an enemy navy or, much more commonly, an earthquake.

  • Interesting perspectives, Tom. Thanks for sharing!

    I wonder if the Hiroshima bomb has any depth psychological implications on contemporary Japanese pop culture. Curious about that one.

  • Tom J. Cassidy

    Undoubtedly. I imagine it’s imprinted on their collective psyche deeper than most of the rest of the world can imagine.

    I should point out, Eivind, that what little I understand about invasion fiction comes from watching this or that movie, plus a quick reading from – as I like to call it – “The Gospel of St. Wiki.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_fiction

  • Yeah, and I’m wondering if the Japanese tradition of the kaiju (the big monsters) is related to the atom bomb. Godzilla appeared about a decade after Hiroshima.

    Gospel of St. Wiki – hah lol. I’ll check it out. Thanks for a stimulating exchange.

  • In fact, checking out the Wiki article on Godzilla makes the connection to the atom bomb explicit. Fascinating stuff. No wonder I love using movies to read the minds and souls of the people! :)

  • Tom J. Cassidy

    :^)

  • Erin Michaela Brandt

    There also occurs to me the simple perspective of: when you have been/played/ thought of being in the X role (perpetrator, etc.), you imagine that others have your perspective (you imagine that they think about/plan on being perpetrators).

    We humans fear X from others b/c WE do/think X, and we imagine that others think the same.

  • Erin Michaela Brandt

    Seeking education here:
    “And in just a few years, they managed to virtually wipe out the American Buffalo, the animal so sacred to the Native American, showing in the process, true to the Western industrial mindset, their horrific contempt of the miracle and mystery of nature and its inherent sacred order.”

    If the Mayflower came in 1640, and the Industrial Revolution only began about 1760 (according to the Gospel of St. Wiki), could you explain how the “Western industrial mindset” related to the American Buffalo?

  • The way I see it, Erin, the Western industrial mindset predates factories and electricity. The way I see it, it was that mindset that created the industrial revolution in the first place. In other words, the industrial mindset predates industry, the way we know it today.

  • Yep. My thoughts exactly. If I think of killing people, I think that other people think of killing me. So the more violence my mind breeds, the more I will swear that people are out to get me, ensuring my need for guns, violence etc. The US is in a vicious spiral here.

  • Erin Michaela Brandt

    That’s what I figured. Thank you!

    If you could (or choose to spend the energy to do so now) briefly encapsulate the “Western industrial mindset” as it relates to your comment about “horrific contempt of the miracle and mystery of nature and its inherent sacred order,” would you say a bit more about that?

  • Erin Michaela Brandt

    I think all humans do this, at all times, unless we are aware otherwise…

  • Definitely.

  • Your question stretches me, Erin, but I think the industrial mindset is closely linked with Christianity, particularly the book of Genesis.

    “God blessed the people. And he said, ‘Have a
    large family and produce many descendants. Live everywhere on the earth and
    rule over it. Rule over the fish that are in the sea. Rule over the birds that
    fly in the air. And rule over all creatures that live on the earth.’” (EasyEnglish Bible version)

    It’s hard not to become arrogant when God gives instructions of this sort. I think God fucked up.

    When God tells humans to rule over the Earth as opposed to serve as its stewards, manipulating Earth’s resources through any means necessary is a logical next step. After all, it was sanctioned by the Supreme Being. It must be good right?

    I think Christianity is the reason why the West rose to be the technological leaders of human civilization. As a religion, it was frequently in active opposition to technological advances, but the basic world view that human beings should control and manipulate the Earth was transferred into the Western Enlightenment. Religion became culture, culture became science, science became the industrial revolution.

    Personally, I think the idea that man and woman are to “rule” over the Earth is blasphemy. The idea has me feel a bit sick. It is the antithesis of observing nature and being filled with wonder. I have in my life frequently been disturbed by the level of contempt many Christians have for animals and nature, compared to, say, Buddhists and Hindus.

    Just some loose thoughts. Do they make a bit of sense to you?

  • Erin Michaela Brandt

    Both sorry and happy to stretch you, Eivind. :-)

    My brain didn’t grasp/ retain this sort of knowledge from school, so I appreciate your thoughts here.

    Makes absolute sense, and I resonate with feeling sick. I remember reading early thought/ philosophy/ business leaders in America saying that their great motivation was that God said they must lead… and dominate the Earth. Yay to the first. Nay to the second.

    I always wondered if it was a translation issue… ruling vs. stewardship. While I hoped so, the damage has been done.

    I took a class in Daoism when I was 12 and it resonated so deeply for me… it occurred to me as so much closer to the “truth.”

  • Erin Michaela Brandt

    Thank you for your time and energy, Eivind. Grateful.

  • Pingback: Moving from passive to active movie-watching » Masculinity-Movies.com()

Tired of being a nice, domesticated man? Time to take a chance in life and offer your gifts to a burning world?

If so, would you like to join a tribe of hundreds of men all over the world who are committed to inner and outer growth? Would you like to stay up to date on the latest developments on this site?

And would you like to receive a unique introduction to the archetypal system King, Warrior, Magician, Lover, for which this website is famous?

Then sign up now and join us as we co-create a better world.

I look forward to getting to know you!

Warmly,
Eivind, Masculinity-Movies.com founder

Read previous post:
Conversations with men #2: Circling and superheroes

In this interview, I talk with John Thompson and Sean Wilkinson of Circling Europe about the practice of Circling, symbols...

Close